YouTube Drama Tabloid News Commentary January 27

January 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

UTubeDrama.net Webmaster Trevor Rieger

January 27 Dramatic Version

Riley34470 Public Defense Draws Line Against Harassment Culture

Riley34470 publicly defended GayDiamond by directly challenging critics to confront their disagreements openly rather than resorting to harassment, a stance that immediately positioned him within a broader conversation about intimidation and accountability in online disputes. His statement was framed not as an attempt to silence criticism, but as a call to elevate how criticism is delivered, emphasizing that disagreement loses legitimacy when it becomes personal, repetitive, or threatening. Observers noted that Riley34470 approach reflected a growing fatigue within creator communities toward mob style behavior, where anonymity and volume are used to overwhelm individuals rather than address ideas. By urging critics to speak plainly and take responsibility for their words, he highlighted the power imbalance that often exists when multiple users target a single creator. The defense also underscored the social risks of stepping into contentious situations, as supporting a polarizing figure can attract backlash by association. Nevertheless, Riley34470 framed solidarity as necessary, arguing that silence enables harassment to normalize. The discussion expanded into how creators navigate loyalty, principle, and self preservation in volatile environments. Some praised the statement as principled courage, while others questioned whether public defenses escalate conflict by drawing more attention. The episode illustrated how standing up for peers can function as both moral statement and strategic risk, reinforcing the idea that creator culture is shaped as much by interpersonal ethics as by content itself. In positioning harassment as unacceptable regardless of target, Riley34470 contributed to ongoing efforts to redefine norms around conflict, disagreement, and accountability online.

Supexellency Provocative Character Video Tests Satire Limits

Supexellency uploaded a character based video portraying a controversial fictional scenario, sparking extensive discussion about satire, boundaries in comedy, and the responsibilities that come with provocative storytelling. The video leaned heavily on exaggerated characterization and narrative framing, prompting debate over whether the intent was to critique harmful ideas or simply shock for engagement. Supporters argued that satire often requires discomfort to function, using extreme scenarios to expose absurdity or provoke reflection. Critics countered that without sufficient contextual cues, satire risks being misinterpreted or reinforcing the very ideas it seeks to critique. The discussion highlighted how tone, framing, and audience expectation play critical roles in determining reception, especially on platforms where content is consumed quickly and often without full context. Supexellency defended the creative choice as character driven storytelling rather than endorsement, emphasizing the distinction between fictional portrayal and real world belief. Observers noted that YouTube presents unique challenges for satire, as algorithms reward attention but do not account for nuance, potentially amplifying content divorced from its intent. The debate extended into broader questions about creative freedom, asking whether creators should self limit to avoid misinterpretation or trust audiences to engage critically. Supexellency video became a focal point for examining how comedy evolves in increasingly diverse and sensitive online spaces, where global audiences bring varied cultural frameworks. The episode underscored that satire remains one of the most contested forms of expression, requiring creators to constantly negotiate the line between provocation and responsibility.

Cloud8745 Walkthrough Exit Reflects Creator Burnout and Evolution

Cloud8745 announced plans to stop producing video game walkthrough content, explaining that his interests were shifting and that continuing no longer felt creatively fulfilling. The decision resonated with many creators who recognized the tension between audience expectation and personal growth. Walkthrough content, while often effective for building consistent viewership, can become repetitive and restrictive over time, especially when creators feel obligated to cover games they no longer enjoy. Cloud8745 framed the announcement as an honest reassessment rather than a dramatic exit, emphasizing that evolving interests are a natural part of long term creative work. Observers noted that such transitions are often fraught with anxiety, as changing formats can risk alienating established audiences. The discussion highlighted how burnout manifests not only as exhaustion, but as loss of curiosity and motivation. Supporters praised the transparency, arguing that authenticity strengthens trust even when content direction changes. Critics worried about sustainability, pointing out that algorithmic systems often penalize shifts away from proven niches. Cloud8745 decision became a case study in how creators weigh stability against fulfillment, illustrating that longevity on platforms often requires reinvention. The episode reinforced the idea that creators are not static brands, but individuals whose interests and capacities evolve. By openly stepping away from walkthroughs, Cloud8745 contributed to a broader normalization of creative pivots, challenging the expectation that success demands perpetual repetition.

SMPfilms Corey Williams Eyes Animal Show Expansion

SMPfilms Corey Williams expressed interest in hosting his own animal focused show, signaling a desire to expand beyond the sketch comedy and music content that initially defined his channel. The idea was met with enthusiasm from fans who recognized his long standing affection for animals and his energetic on screen personality. Observers noted that established creators often reach a point where exploring new formats becomes both a creative necessity and an opportunity to reach different audiences. For SMPfilms, an animal show represented a blend of entertainment and personal passion, potentially allowing him to channel curiosity and humor into a format less reliant on scripted performance. The discussion highlighted how diversification can mitigate burnout by refreshing creative routines while leveraging existing audience goodwill. Critics cautioned that format shifts always carry risk, as audiences drawn to one style may not follow into another. However, supporters argued that authenticity often transcends format, and that creators who visibly enjoy their content can maintain engagement even through change. The animal show concept also reflected broader trends in YouTube content, where educational and wholesome formats coexist alongside comedy and commentary. SMPfilms interest underscored how platform longevity often depends on adaptability, with creators experimenting to avoid stagnation. The episode illustrated how expanding creative scope can function as both reinvention and recommitment, allowing established figures to remain relevant while honoring evolving interests.

SMPfilms Kitty Song Legacy Anchors Early YouTube Culture

SMPfilms Corey Williams is widely remembered for performing The Kitty Song, a video that became a defining moment in early YouTube culture and helped cement his reputation for catchy, humorous musical content. The song captured the playful, low barrier creativity that characterized the platform in its formative years, when virality often emerged from spontaneity rather than optimization. Observers frequently cite The Kitty Song as emblematic of an era where personality and charm mattered more than production polish, resonating with audiences seeking simple joy and relatability. For SMPfilms, the video functioned as both breakthrough and benchmark, shaping audience expectations for his future work. The legacy of the song sparked discussion about how early viral successes can both empower and constrain creators, creating lasting associations that follow them throughout their careers. While some artists struggle to move beyond defining hits, others leverage them as foundations for broader exploration. SMPfilms ability to remain relevant years later speaks to adaptability and willingness to evolve while honoring past successes. The Kitty Song continues to be referenced as a cultural touchstone, illustrating how early YouTube moments retain nostalgic power even as the platform professionalizes. The discussion highlighted how shared memories contribute to community identity, linking creators and audiences through collective experience. In reflecting on The Kitty Song, observers emphasized that its impact extends beyond metrics, representing a formative chapter in online creativity where experimentation, humor, and accessibility shaped the medium’s future.

Paperlilies Clarifies YouTube Distance From Grassroots Meetups

Paperlilies stated that YouTube does not officially support or organize independent YouTube gatherings, a clarification that resonated strongly within creator communities that often blur the line between platform endorsement and grassroots enthusiasm. Her comments emphasized that most creator meetups emerge organically from shared interest, mutual fandom, or informal networking rather than from any centralized authority. By underscoring the informal nature of these events, Paperlilies highlighted the importance of personal responsibility for both organizers and attendees, particularly around safety, logistics, and expectations. Observers noted that early creator culture thrived on spontaneity, with meetups often arranged through comments, forums, or social media messages without institutional oversight. While this informality fostered closeness and accessibility, it also introduced risks when participants assumed implicit platform backing. Paperlilies remarks reframed these gatherings as personal initiatives, reminding creators that YouTube operates primarily as a hosting service rather than a community organizer. The discussion expanded into how misunderstandings about endorsement can lead to misplaced trust, especially among younger or newer creators. Commentators argued that clarity helps preserve the authenticity of meetups while encouraging participants to make informed decisions. The episode also raised broader questions about how platforms balance fostering community with limiting liability. By drawing a clear boundary, Paperlilies contributed to a more realistic understanding of how creator communities function, emphasizing that connection and collaboration flourish through individual initiative rather than official orchestration. Her clarification served as a reminder that the strength of creator culture often lies in its independence, even as that independence requires care, transparency, and accountability from those involved.

WiseManThree Council Critique Reflects Advisory Skepticism

WiseManThree criticized YouTube decision to appoint SarryCrey to the YouTube Council, framing the move as symbolic rather than substantive and expressing doubt about the effectiveness of platform appointed representation. His remarks reflected a broader skepticism shared by many creators who question whether advisory groups meaningfully influence policy or primarily serve as public relations gestures. WiseManThree argued that councils often lack real power, operating without clear authority, transparency, or mechanisms to hold platforms accountable for acting on feedback. Observers noted that such skepticism is rooted in long standing experiences where creator input appears acknowledged but not visibly implemented. The discussion highlighted tension between representation and legitimacy, as creators debate who speaks for whom and under what mandate. WiseManThree comments suggested that trust in advisory structures depends not on the individuals appointed, but on the outcomes they can demonstrably affect. Supporters of his view argued that without tangible policy changes, councils risk being perceived as decorative rather than functional. Others countered that even symbolic representation can open channels of communication and gradually influence culture. The debate extended into questions about selection processes, diversity of perspective, and whether councils should be elected, rotated, or expanded. WiseManThree critique underscored a recurring theme in creator discourse, that transparency and accountability matter as much as inclusion. His remarks framed the council not as inherently flawed, but as insufficiently empowered, prompting reflection on how platforms might better integrate creator voices into decision making. The episode illustrated how skepticism itself functions as a form of engagement, pushing for structures that move beyond optics toward meaningful participation.

jezuzfreek777 Authenticity Pressure Triggers Exit Consideration

jezuzfreek777 considered closing his YouTube account after facing sustained criticism from viewers questioning his authenticity, a situation that highlighted the emotional toll of identity disputes in public online spaces. The criticism centered on perceived inconsistencies between his stated beliefs and audience expectations, illustrating how creators can become trapped between self expression and community projection. jezuzfreek777 response reflected exhaustion with the constant need to justify personal identity, values, or sincerity to an audience that feels entitled to explanations. Observers noted that authenticity has become a paradoxical demand, as creators are expected to be genuine while also conforming to established personas that audiences recognize. The discussion expanded into how prolonged scrutiny can erode motivation, especially when feedback shifts from content critique to personal judgment. Supporters expressed empathy, arguing that no creator should feel obligated to perform a fixed identity indefinitely. Critics suggested that public platforms inherently invite evaluation, making disengagement a personal choice rather than an injustice. The episode highlighted how audience pressure can accumulate, turning comment sections into sites of interrogation rather than dialogue. jezuzfreek777 contemplation of leaving was framed as a coping mechanism rather than defeat, underscoring the importance of mental health in creator sustainability. Commentators reflected on how creators often underestimate the psychological cost of visibility, particularly when identity becomes a focal point. The situation served as a reminder that behind channels are individuals negotiating selfhood in front of crowds, and that stepping away can be an act of self preservation. In this context, jezuzfreek777 experience illustrated how authenticity disputes are less about truth and more about the strain of living under constant interpretation.

SMPfilms Corey Williams Grounds Fame With Everyday Work Life

SMPfilms Corey Williams shared details about his offline life by mentioning employment at a Best Buy location in Thousand Oaks, California, a disclosure that humanized his creator persona and resonated with audiences accustomed to associating online fame with full time entertainment careers. By connecting his creative output with ordinary work experience, SMPfilms challenged assumptions that viral success immediately translates into financial independence. Observers noted that such transparency helps demystify the creator economy, revealing how many early YouTube figures balanced passion projects with conventional employment. The discussion highlighted how holding a day job can ground creators, providing stability while insulating creative work from purely financial pressure. SMPfilms disclosure also sparked nostalgia for an era when creators were more openly candid about their circumstances, before professionalization introduced polished narratives of success. Supporters appreciated the relatability, arguing that it reinforced the idea that creativity does not require detachment from everyday life. Critics questioned whether such openness invites unwanted scrutiny, blurring boundaries between personal and public spheres. The episode underscored how sharing mundane details can recalibrate audience perception, shifting focus from celebrity to personhood. For SMPfilms, mentioning retail employment reframed his creative achievements as part of a broader life rather than its entirety. Commentators reflected on how many creators juggle multiple identities, navigating between public recognition and private routine. The discussion reinforced that online visibility exists on a spectrum, and that acknowledging ordinary work can normalize diverse paths within creator culture. In doing so, SMPfilms offered a reminder that success is not singular, and that creative fulfillment often coexists with practical realities.

Boh3m3 Ranking Decline Sparks Visibility and Motivation Concerns

Boh3m3 was observed losing visibility on YouTube most subscribed rankings, prompting speculation about whether he might step away from the platform and highlighting how fluctuating popularity can affect creator motivation. Rankings, while often treated as superficial metrics, carry symbolic weight that can influence self perception and audience attention. Observers noted that falling off visible lists can feel like a loss of relevance, even when viewership remains stable. For creators like Boh3m3, whose identity may be intertwined with recognition and placement, such shifts can trigger reflection about longevity and purpose. The discussion highlighted how algorithmic and cultural changes constantly reshape prominence, rewarding novelty and consistency while sidelining channels that slow down or deviate from trends. Commentators debated whether rankings accurately reflect creative impact, arguing that quality and community engagement often persist independent of numerical position. Nevertheless, the psychological impact of declining visibility was widely acknowledged, as creators operate within ecosystems that publicly quantify success. Boh3m3 situation became a case study in how external metrics influence internal motivation, sometimes pushing creators toward reinvention or withdrawal. Supporters encouraged resilience, emphasizing that stepping back from rankings can free creators from comparison driven pressure. Others speculated that loss of spotlight can erode incentive, especially when growth stalls after years of effort. The episode underscored how popularity on YouTube is inherently unstable, shaped by forces beyond individual control. In reflecting on Boh3m3 trajectory, observers highlighted the need for sustainable motivation rooted in creativity rather than placement. The situation illustrated how visibility ebbs and flows, and how creators must continually renegotiate their relationship with metrics that both elevate and constrain their sense of success.

Church0fScientology Anonymous Protest Plans Show Online to Offline Activism

Church0fScientology Anonymous announced plans for coordinated protests at Scientology centers, emphasizing activism, public awareness, and collective action as core motivations behind the effort. The announcement illustrated how YouTube and related platforms have been used not only for commentary and critique, but also as logistical tools for organizing offline demonstrations. Supporters framed the plan as a form of participatory activism, where individuals who may never meet in person can still coordinate around shared goals, messaging, and timing. The use of online video and discussion spaces allowed participants to exchange information, outline expectations, and encourage turnout without relying on traditional organizational structures. Observers noted that such movements reflect a broader shift in how activism operates, increasingly decentralized and driven by digital communication rather than hierarchical leadership. At the same time, the announcement raised questions about responsibility, safety, and accountability when online calls to action translate into physical gatherings. Commentators emphasized the importance of peaceful conduct, clear intentions, and respect for legal boundaries when organizing protests. The case highlighted how platforms like YouTube can amplify activist messages quickly, reaching audiences far beyond local communities and transforming niche concerns into visible public events. Critics cautioned that online mobilization can sometimes oversimplify complex issues, while supporters argued that visibility itself is a catalyst for dialogue and scrutiny. The Church0fScientology Anonymous plans became an example of how creator culture intersects with civic engagement, demonstrating that online communities can function as organizing hubs as well as spaces for debate. The episode underscored the evolving role of digital platforms in shaping real world participation, where videos and posts serve as rallying points that blur the boundary between virtual discussion and physical action.

XenuTV Suspension Mystery Fuels Transparency Debate

XenuTV remained suspended from YouTube, with external websites and commentators speculating about the reasons behind the continued enforcement. The absence of a clear, detailed explanation from the platform fueled debate about moderation transparency and how controversial subject matter intersects with enforcement decisions. Supporters of clearer communication argued that prolonged suspensions without public reasoning encourage rumor, misinformation, and distrust, as audiences attempt to fill gaps with conjecture. Observers noted that controversial topics often attract heightened scrutiny, making it difficult to determine whether enforcement is based on policy violations, external pressure, or cumulative reporting. The XenuTV case became a reference point in broader discussions about how platforms handle content that challenges powerful institutions or polarizing beliefs. Critics of the suspension suggested that lack of transparency undermines confidence in moderation systems, while others argued that platforms are not obligated to disclose internal processes in detail. The debate highlighted the asymmetry between creators and platforms, where enforcement decisions can dramatically affect visibility and livelihood, yet avenues for explanation remain limited. Commentators emphasized that even when enforcement is justified, opacity can create perceptions of bias or arbitrariness. The situation also underscored the role of third party sites and forums in shaping narratives around moderation, as they often become primary sources of information when official statements are sparse. XenuTV ongoing suspension illustrated how enforcement actions can ripple outward, influencing discourse about free expression, platform power, and accountability. The episode reinforced calls for clearer guidelines and communication, even as it acknowledged the complexity of moderating large scale platforms dealing with sensitive and contentious material.

MrFetch Threat Report Highlights Digital Harassment Risks

MrFetch reported receiving a serious threat allegedly from an anonymous cyberstalker targeting GayDiamond, drawing renewed attention to the real world impact of online harassment. His statement underscored how digital intimidation does not always remain confined to screens, but can escalate into messages perceived as credible threats that affect personal safety and wellbeing. Observers emphasized that such incidents highlight the emotional and psychological toll of sustained harassment, particularly when anonymity shields perpetrators from accountability. MrFetch remarks were framed as a warning rather than a sensational claim, focusing on the need to take threats seriously and address them through appropriate channels. The discussion expanded into broader concerns about how platforms handle reports of harassment, stalking, and intimidation, especially when patterns span multiple accounts or services. Commentators noted that while individual messages may seem isolated, cumulative behavior can create an atmosphere of fear and pressure that discourages participation. The case also raised questions about community responsibility, urging bystanders to avoid amplifying harassment and to support targets rather than dismissing concerns. Observers highlighted that digital safety requires cooperation between platforms, users, and in some cases external authorities, particularly when threats suggest potential offline harm. MrFetch experience became part of a larger conversation about boundaries, anonymity, and the limits of tolerance in online spaces. The episode reinforced the idea that harassment is not merely a matter of hurt feelings, but can have tangible consequences that warrant serious attention. It served as a reminder that behind usernames are real people whose safety and peace of mind can be affected by unchecked online behavior.

KatLitter Return After Incarceration Sparks Accountability Dialogue

KatLitter explained that her seven month absence from YouTube was due to time spent incarcerated, a disclosure that immediately reframed her return in terms of accountability, transparency, and rebuilding trust. Upon coming back to the platform, she chose to address her experience openly rather than deflect or obscure it, prompting a mix of support, curiosity, and critical discussion. Observers noted that few creators publicly acknowledge such experiences, making her candor notable within a culture that often prioritizes image management. KatLitter framed her return as an opportunity to reflect on consequences, personal growth, and the challenges of reintegration into online spaces after a significant interruption. The discussion highlighted how audiences respond differently to vulnerability, with some praising honesty and others questioning whether personal history should influence reception of content. Commentators emphasized that transparency can humanize creators, but also exposes them to renewed scrutiny and judgment. The episode raised broader questions about redemption, second chances, and how online communities respond when creators disclose difficult aspects of their lives. Observers reflected on how incarceration remains stigmatized, and how public disclosure can either challenge or reinforce that stigma depending on audience reaction. KatLitter experience illustrated that returning to YouTube after a prolonged absence requires renegotiating identity, expectations, and audience relationships. The situation underscored that creator culture does not exist in isolation from broader social realities, and that personal histories inevitably intersect with public personas. Her return contributed to ongoing dialogue about accountability and resilience, emphasizing that rebuilding presence online often involves confronting past circumstances rather than erasing them.

f3xpgm Observes Drama as a Recurring Creator Cycle

f3xpgm reflected on recurring patterns of drama across YouTube, suggesting that conflict and controversy are almost inevitable aspects of creator culture rather than isolated anomalies. His observation framed drama as a cyclical phenomenon driven by visibility, competition, and overlapping social networks, where disputes resurface in different forms as platforms and personalities evolve. According to f3xpgm, creators operate in environments that reward attention, making conflict a recurring accelerant even when participants intend to avoid it. Observers noted that drama often emerges from misunderstandings, shifting alliances, or audience interpretation rather than deliberate provocation. The reflection highlighted how shared history within creator communities creates fertile ground for old grievances to reemerge, especially when new events echo past patterns. f3xpgm comments resonated with creators who have witnessed similar cycles repeat over years, reinforcing a sense that drama is woven into the fabric of online interaction. Commentators discussed whether such conflict is a byproduct of human nature amplified by technology, or a structural feature of platforms that monetize engagement. The observation prompted debate about whether creators can meaningfully opt out of drama, or whether participation is unavoidable once visibility reaches a certain threshold. f3xpgm framing suggested that awareness of these cycles may help creators navigate them with more perspective, reducing personal investment in each new controversy. The discussion underscored how recognizing patterns can foster resilience, encouraging creators to contextualize conflict rather than internalize it. By presenting drama as shared experience rather than personal failure, f3xpgm offered a lens through which creators and audiences alike can understand recurring tensions as part of an evolving ecosystem rather than isolated crises.

January 27 Child Version (PG 13)

Riley34470 publicly defended GayDiamond by challenging critics to address their concerns directly rather than through harassment. His statement reflected a broader stance against intimidation and emphasized standing up for fellow creators within contentious online disputes.
Supexellency uploaded a character-based video that portrayed a controversial fictional scenario. The content sparked discussion about satire, boundaries in comedy, and how creators balance provocative themes with responsible storytelling on YouTube.
Cloud8745 announced plans to stop producing video game walkthrough content, explaining that his interests were changing. The decision highlighted how creators often shift focus over time due to burnout, evolving creativity, or audience dynamics.
SMPfilms Corey Williams expressed interest in hosting his own animal-focused show, reflecting his enthusiasm for entertainment beyond sketch comedy and music. The idea showcased how established creators explore new formats to expand their creative reach.
SMPfilms Corey Williams is widely remembered for performing The Kitty Song, a video that became a defining moment in early YouTube culture and helped cement his reputation for catchy, humorous musical content.
Paperlilies stated that YouTube does not officially support or organize independent YouTube gatherings. Her comments clarified the informal nature of creator meetups and emphasized personal responsibility when attending or organizing community events.
WiseManThree criticized YouTube's decision to appoint SarryCrey to the YouTube Council, framing it as symbolic rather than serious. His remarks reflected skepticism toward platform-appointed representation and creator trust in advisory groups.
jezuzfreek777 considered closing his YouTube account after facing criticism from viewers questioning his authenticity. The situation highlighted how identity disputes and audience pressure can affect a creator's willingness to remain active online.
SMPfilms Corey Williams also shared details about his offline life, mentioning employment at Best Buy in Thousand Oaks, California. This disclosure humanized his creator persona by connecting online fame with everyday work life.
Boh3m3 was observed losing visibility on YouTube's most-subscribed rankings, prompting speculation about whether he might step away from the platform. The situation illustrated how fluctuating popularity can impact creator motivation.
Church0fScientology Anonymous announced plans for coordinated protests at Scientology centers, emphasizing activism, public awareness, and collective action. The announcement reflected how YouTube has been used to organize offline demonstrations.
XenuTV remained suspended from YouTube, with external sites speculating about the reasons. The case fueled debate about moderation transparency, outside influence, and how controversial topics intersect with platform enforcement.
MrFetch reported receiving a serious threat allegedly from an anonymous cyberstalker targeting GayDiamond. His statement underscored ongoing concerns about online safety and the real-world impact of digital harassment.
KatLitter explained that her seven-month absence from YouTube was due to time spent incarcerated. Upon returning, she shared her experience openly, contributing to discussions about personal accountability and rebuilding online presence.
f3xpgm reflected on recurring patterns of drama across YouTube, suggesting that conflict and controversy are almost inevitable parts of creator culture. His observation framed drama as a shared, recurring experience among online personalities.

January 27 Adult Version (R)

Riley34470 challenges GayDiamond HATERS to come and get him.
Supexellency plays an illegal Mexican immigrant STEALING Social Security Numbers.
Cloud8745 says he will STOP doing video game walkthrough videos.
SMPfilms Corey Williams says he wants to host his own ANIMAL SHOW.
SMPfilms Corey Williams will be remembered as that guy who sung "The Kitty Song".
xPLx Paperlilies says YouTube DOES NOT SUPPORT OR ORGANIZE these YouTube Gatherings.
WiseManThree says YouTube CHOSE SarryCrey to be on the YouTube Council as a JOKE.
jezuzfreek777 may CLOSE HIS YouTube ACCOUNT because of CHRISTIANS calling him FAKE.
SMPfilms Corey Williams says he WORKS AT BEST BUY in Thousand Oaks, Cal.
Boh3m3 is fading away from the Most Subscribed List and might LEAVE YouTube.
Church0fScientology Anonymous + February 10 = PROTEST at Scientology Centers.
XenuTV is STILL suspended and EbaumsWorld blames Scientology.
MrFetch says "Anonymous" YouTube CyberStalker threatened to BURN DOWN GayDiamond's trailer.
KatLitter says during her 7 month absence from YouTube she WENT TO JAIL.
f3xpgm says that there is a "Little Trevor" DRAMA in every YouTuber.

January 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

UTubeDrama.net Webmaster Trevor Rieger